
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Article Copyright
When an article is published in this journal, the Journal retains the copyright. Author(s) may republish the article as part of a book or other materials. A copyright statement is displayed on the full-text PDF of each article.
All opinions and reports within the articles that are published in the Worldwide Journal of research are the personal opinions of the author(s). Worldwide Journal of research, Editors, and the publisher do not accept any responsibility for these articles.
Editorial Policy
This policy describes guidelines in the publication process of our journals. Specifically, Journal Issues adopts and strives to adhere to the following standards and requirements: COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics.
Authorship
An author is an individual who has significantly contributed to the development of a manuscript. The WJR recommends that authorship be based on the following four criteria:
- Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; and
b. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and
c. Final approval of the version to be published; and
d. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Acknowledgment
Individuals who participated in the development of a manuscript but do not qualify as an author should be acknowledged. Organizations that provided support in terms of funding and/or other resources should also be acknowledged.
Changes in authorship
Whenever there is a need to make changes in the authorship of a manuscript or a published article, the changes will be implemented according to COPE specification. Only corresponding authors can make a request for a change in authorship. The request should be made to the editor using the Changes in Authorship Form or via e-mail from the corresponding author's email address.
Submission of Manuscript
Authors should read the “Authors Guidelines” on the journal’s page before making a submission. The manuscript should be prepared according to the style and specifications of the journal’s policy. The authors listed on the manuscript should have met the requirements for Authorship specified above. Where possible, specify the contribution of each of the authors.
All authors should approve the final version of the manuscript prior to submission. Once a manuscript is submitted, it is therefore assumed that all authors have read and given their approval for the submission of the manuscript. Contact information of all authors should be stated in the manuscript. Surname/Other names, affiliation, emails, and phone/fax numbers.
Declaration of Conflicts of Interest should be stated in the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
“Conflict of interest (COI) exists when there is a divergence between an individual’s private interests (competing interests) and his or her responsibilities to scientific and publishing activities such that a reasonable observer might wonder if the individual’s behavior or judgment was motivated by considerations of his or her competing interests” WAME4.
The authors should disclose all financial/relevant interests that may have influenced the development of the manuscript.
A Hearing Suite of Tympanoplasty at TPLA Antananarivo Madagascar in 2014
Corresponding Author(s) : Ginnot Berthin ANDRIAMAMPIONONA
WORLDWIDE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH,
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Volume 2 Number 1
Abstract
Background: The tympanic perforation is a lesion very marked during a otologic affection; this organic entity can include a enormous auditive loss. The tympanoplasty constitutes a therapeutic option to improve this auditive failure. The objective of our descriptive retrospective study was to evaluate the auditive profit after a tympanoplasty. This study included all patients operated of a tympanoplasty to realize in the service Otorhinolaryngology of the TPLA of Madagascar over one 12 months period.
Results: A population of 50 patients was listed with a 32 years Middle Age and a sex-ratio with 0,5. Hearing loss was the most frequent reason for consultation. The central tympanic perforation of intermediate size dominates the organic clinical presentation. The tympanoplasty standard I to occupy the majority part of practiced intervention. The hearing improvement was revealed in 56% of the cases with an average auditive profit of 17,07 dB.
Conclusion: The tympanoplasty is a otologic surgery making it possible to improve the hearing acuteness. The average hearing profit of 17,07 dB into after operation is obtained at more half of our patients. The favorable result is especially detected on the tympanoplasty without rebuilding of the ossicles but in the event of signs of functional discomfort, patients are referred to a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation department.
Key words: acuity hearing, gain hearing, tympanic membrane, hearing loss, tympanoplasty
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
-
1. Abou M, Heshiki R, Portmann D, Négrevergne M. Tympanoplastie de renforcement en mosaïque de cartilage (différences avec la technique en palissade). Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005 ;126(3):181-9.
2. I Saliba Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: how we do it Clin Otolaryngol. 2008; 33(6): 610–614.
3. Arunabha S, Bijan B, Debasish G, Deepjoy B, Debasish A. A Study on Outcome of Underlay, Overlay and Combined Techniques of Myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 64(1): 63–6.
4. Sergi B, Galli J, De Corso E, Parrilla C, Paludetti G. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011; 31(6): 366–71
5. Sharankumar S. Pre-operative and Post-operative assessment of hearing following tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 64(4): 377–381.
6. Shaikh AA, Shiraz MA, Salman O, Shaikh M, Rafi T. Outcome of tympanoplasty type 1 by underlay technique. JLUMHS. 2009; 08(1): 80-4
7. Mundra R, Richi S, Richa A. Tympanoplasty in Subtotal Perforation with Graft Supported by a Slice of Cartilage: A Study with Near 100 % Results. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 65(Suppl 3): 631–635.
8. Nouvian R, Malinvaud D, Van den Abbeele, Puel J, Bonfils P, Avan P. Physiologie de l’audition. EMC (Elsevier SAS, Paris), Oto-rhino-laryngologie, 20-030-A-10, 2006.
9. Fadl AF. Outcome of type 1 tympanoplasty. Saudi Med J. 2003 ;24(1):58-61
10. Bonfils P, Chevallier J. Anatomie ORL 3e édition (Lavoisier SAS). 2011 :307-10.
11. Glasscock ME III. Tympanic membrane grafting with fascia: overlay vs undersurface technique. Laryngoscope. 1973; 83:754–770.
12. Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty for Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(5):796-804
13. Doyle JP, Schleuning AJ, Echevarria J. Myringoplasty: should grafts be placed medial or lateral to the tympanic membrane? Laryngoscope. 1972; 82:1425–1430
14. Singh M, Rai A, Bandyopadhyay S, et al. Comparative study of the underlay and overlay techniques of myringoplasty in large and subtotal perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol. 2003; 117:444–448.
15. Kotecha B, Fowler S, Topham J. Myringoplasty: a prospective audit study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999; 24:126–129.
16. Tall , N’diaye M, Diom E, Nao E, Deguenonvo R, Diallo B et al. Myringoplastie par la technique des boutonnières. J. Tun orl. 2012 ; 28 : 7-12
17. Mouzali A, Kanoun K, Haraoubia M, Ouennoughiv K, Zemirli O. Tympanoplasties chez l’enfant : à propos de 70 cas. Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale. 2014 ; 131(4): 135